Best Project Management Tools for 11-50 Person Companies 

When your business was just you, yourself, and maybe a handful of others, you had zero intention of running a chaotic operation. It just kinda happened. You were focused on growth and solving the most immediate problem blocking growth.

The company grew and operational chaos began to pile up very quietly in the background. And now that operational chaos is bubbling up right and left.

When you’re in the stage of 11-50 employees, you carry some of the most operational risk you ever will. You’re too big at this point to just rely on knowledge that lives in the CEOs head but you’re too small to have an entire operations team and all the fancy enterprise level systems.

And you know what’s ironic? This is when a project management tool can alleviate a lot of pain for teams this size, but it’s also when companies resist project management the hardest.

Has your team outgrown the current way of working?

Here are some warning signs we see in 11-50 person companies that signal they need to make some operational adjustments:

  • The question of, “well who owns that?” when referring to tasks or projects starts coming up a lot

  • When you do your weekly check-in’s, they tend to lean reactive rather than productive

  • Timelines aren’t written down, and everyone has a different idea of the due date for important deliverables

  • New hires take a long time to gain true understanding of their roles and every new hire is trained differently, resulting in a lot of nuance to the way your teams work

  • Tracking projects is happening in your chat tool or email threads

  • Duplicate work and errors are becoming more frequent

  • You’re having the same “difficult conversations” continuously

What is poor project management costing you?

Think of operational weakness like interest. It compounds, and it compounds rapidly.

Research consistently shows that poor project management contributes to project failure, wasted budget, and employee burnout. But more importantly than this, is the cultural cost. Your best people will leave when they get sick and tired of the madness. It leads to under appreciation, burnout, and they realize they don’t have to put up with it, especially if leadership doesn’t care enough to address it.

At 11-50 employees, you have a wonderful chance to stop this train on the tracks before it multiplies to an uncontrollable place. When you hit 200 employees, fixing project management is a six month to year long initiative. At 11-50, it should only take a few months to get you back on track.

What do 11-50 person teams need from a project management tool?

Not every project management tool on the market is going to work for your team. Some tools will be so overbuilt for a team of your size that it’s overwhelming. Some are too lightweight, and are geared towards 1-10 person teams. We need to help you find the perfect tool.

Here’s what to look for:

  • Visibility: everyone should be able to see work at a glance.

  • Structured ownership: tool forces accountability for every single task.

  • Flexibility: the tool needs to account for the ways all your different teams work. Creative might think in terms of a Kanban board, your founder might want a list view that works on their phone, your engineering team might want a scrum board.

  • Adoption friendly: if your team doesn’t accept & adopt the tool, it’s a waste of time and money. This is why we don’t want it to be too complicated or not address what will actually help your team.

  • Pricing: Per-seat pricing with an 11-50 person team can get hairy. We either need a cost controlled tool, or one where the added seats come at reasonable costs.

The Best Project Management Tools for 11-50 Person Teams

We’ve compiled a list of eight project management tools we’ve seen work for teams of this size. Let’s dive in (scroll down for a visual table breakdown if you’re not in the mood to read the details).

Asana

Best for: Teams who need to get a tool up & running like, tomorrow.

  • Easy adoption

  • Intuitive UI

  • Basic task management fundamentals are there: subtasks, dependencies, milestones, ability to view the work in different ways

Limitations: Resource management

  • Capacity views are limited on lower tiers and requires front heavy configuration

  • The document repository feature isn’t great, so you’ll need to find somewhere else to store SOPs. This isn’t great for trimming down your tech stack.

Bottom Line: If your team is non-technical and speed to adoption is the top priority and reporting is not a priority, this might be a good choice for you.

Monday.com

Best for: Teams that need to manage resources and capacity alongside projects.

  • Sophisticated UI

  • Resource management capabilities are the best out of this list

  • All of your basic PM functionalities are in place and intuitive to use and find

  • Have a specific .dev version for engineering teams

Limitations:

  • Price per seat is the highest of this entire list

  • Best features are gated behind higher tiers

Bottom Line: If insight into resourcing is one of your biggest problems and you have the budget, Monday.com is an excellent tool.

ClickUp

Best for: Teams that need a lot of flexibility between multiple teams and are up for a learning curve.

  • It has every feature you could ever wish for

  • You can pretty much create any view you could ever dream of

  • Pricing is reasonable, however, a lot of fancy features are gated behind add-on pricing

Limitations

  • It has every feature you could ever wish for (yes, this lives in the strengths and weaknesses column)

  • Requires intentional configuration and ongoing governance - which isn’t a bad idea ever, for the record

  • You’ll likely need a pro to guide your implementation

Bottom line: If you have an Operations Manager or someone who is able to help lead the rollout and maintain the system, ClickUp might be the tool for you.

Notion

Best for: teams that heavily rely on documented processes and need those processes to be in the same place as their project tracking.

  • Highly customizable

  • Aesthetically pleasing

  • Allows documentation, SOPs, meeting notes, and project management to live in the same ecosystem

Limitations:

  • This wasn’t intended to be a PM tool, but has somewhat become one? Because of that, it’s a step behind all the other tools with basic project management capabilities

  • Dependency tracking, Gantt views, and workload management are not simple to set up or siply don’t exist at all

Bottom Line: If documentation and projects have equal importance, Notion may be the tool for you. However, you will likely outgrow Notion.

Jira

Best for: Engineering or product teams running agile development workflows.

  • The industry standard for software dev teams

  • Allows sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking

Limitations

  • Often creates more confusion than relief for non-technical teams

Bottom Line: The right choice for engineering-led teams. A difficult sell if you need cross-functional adoption.

Basecamp

Best for: Teams where communication and alignment are the primary pain points.

  • Clean, clear UI/UX and task management

  • Great for asynchronous updates

Limitations:

  • No Gantt views

  • No resource or workload management

  • Visual project planning is non-existent

Bottom line: If your team is communication-first and async alignment is the top priority, and resource management is not a core need, Basecamp may be a good option.

Linear

Best for: Product and engineering teams that prioritize speed and clean UX.

  • Clean UI/UX interface

  • Keyboard shortcuts are an engineering teams dream

  • Cycle and project management features

  • Created specifically for engineering and product teams

Limitations

  • Not great for cross-departmental project management

Bottom line: Best-in-class for product/engineering teams. Too narrow for cross-functional use.

Teamwork

Best for: Client-facing teams, agencies, and service businesses.

  • Task management and PM capabilities are equivalent of Asana and Monday.com

  • Specifically built for agencies as the client collaboration and resource management features are phenomenal

  • Guest access model allowing clients and external stakeholders to be looped in without extensive permissions configuration

Limitations:

  • Teamwork runs a slightly higher cost than some of the other tools on this list

  • The amount of features can introduce a steep learning curve

Bottom line: If you’re a client service org, this is a real contender for you.

Now that you’re overwhelmed, which one should you actually pick? 

Choose ClickUp if 

  • You want the most powerful, flexible platform available

  • You want a tool you can grow into, you don’t want to redo this selection process in three years 

  • Budget is a constraint but you’re willing to invest in a professional to help implement 

  • You have a team member whose role can maintain this moving forward 

Choose Monday.com if 

  • Workload and resource visibility is your biggest issue currently 

  • Leadership needs clean, polished reporting without building it themselves

  • You have the budget for a premium tool and want a polished out-of-the-box experience

Choose Asana if 

  • Fast adoption across a non-technical team is your top priority

  • Your project complexity is moderate and doesn't require heavy customization

  • You've tried other tools before and adoption was always an issue 

Choose Teamwork if 

  • You run an agency or any type of client facing company

  • You will consistently need external collaborators to be able to see how things are moving internally 

  • You need time tracking and resource management integrated 

Choose Notion if 

  • Your team's biggest pain is a disconnected knowledge base and scattered documentation

  • Project complexity is moderate and knowledge management is an equal or bigger priority

  • You want one tool for docs, wikis, and project tracking rather than three

The cost of dragging your feet on project management tool selection 

When we talk to teams, it’s usually the teams who need a PM tool the most that resist it the most. The reasoning? “We’re way too busy to take on a tool rollout right now” or “We’ve tried this in the past and wasted time and money”. 

What we want to help people realize is that the reason you feel busy and stretched thin is because you don’t have a system. Now is the time do it, before your team expands even more. At this point, the daily habits of your team are still malleable, and you can design systems that will scale with you instead of putting a ceiling on your growth. The systems that position you as organized, fast, and capable to clients, investors, and future employees. 

Pick your tool. Run your rollout. And if you need help thinking through the right fit for your team's specific situation, give us a call.

Previous
Previous

The Four Pillars of a Scalable Marketing Department

Next
Next

Why AI Implementations Will Fail Without Solid Marketing Operations